<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>Journal of Borderland Research &#187; Ether</title> <atom:link href="http://journal.borderlands.com/tag/ether/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://journal.borderlands.com</link> <description>Serving Higher Intelligence Since 1945</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 20:24:49 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>Let&#8217;s Be Fantastic</title><link>http://journal.borderlands.com/2011/lets-be-fantastic/</link> <comments>http://journal.borderlands.com/2011/lets-be-fantastic/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 22:14:17 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Isaac</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Etheric Physics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Featured Articles]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Psychic Research]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Radiesthesia & Dowsing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Round Robin]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ufology]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Arthur Eddington]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Aurameter]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cameron Aurameter]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ether]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ether Ship Mystery]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Etheria]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Mark Probert]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Meade Layne]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Radiesthesia]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ramon Natalli]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Verne Cameron]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://journal.borderlands.com/?p=886</guid> <description><![CDATA[Meade Layne does a hit-and-run on "aurameters, etheric objects, thought-forms, teleportation, flying discs and what-have-you"!
Related articles:<ol><li><a
href='http://journal.borderlands.com/2011/fly-lokas-fly/' rel='bookmark' title='Fly, Lokas, Fly!'>Fly, Lokas, Fly!</a></li><li><a
href='http://journal.borderlands.com/2011/mat-and-demat/' rel='bookmark' title='Mat and Demat: Etheric Aspects of the UFO'>Mat and Demat: Etheric Aspects of the UFO</a></li><li><a
href='http://journal.borderlands.com/2011/the-existence-of-an-ether/' rel='bookmark' title='The Existence of an Ether'>The Existence of an Ether</a></li></ol>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The following article, first published in <a
href="http://catalog.borderlands.com/index.php?act=viewProd&#038;productId=335">1952 (RR, Vol. 8, No. 2)</a>, is a general survey of that region of the borderland containing the essential interests of <a
href="http://research.borderlands.com/wiki/Meade_Layne">Meade Layne</a>, skimming the lines between hard sciences, psychic readings, and subtle perceptions to form a basis for further readings of his catalog of research. We present this as an article of interest to those who seek a short respite from a way of thinking that condemns their intuitions and senses as perpetually deceived, or, perhaps, a brief diversion for those who simply wish to be engaged by the cosmic mystery in a thoroughly unconventional way.</em></p><hr
/><p>This is a hit-and-run article, sans literary grace, about aurameter, and etheric objects, and thought-forms and teleportation, and the ethers and the flying Discs and what-have-you. &#8220;A&#8221; stands for Aurameter, so we begin where it seems proper; but afterward mix everything up as seems most improper. The Aurameter is a lately devised gadget intended primarily for water dowsing, but which turns out to have far more important properties &#8211; such as, for example, locating and outlining objects which can&#8217;t be seen. <sup><a
href="#1">[1]</a></sup></p><p>&#8220;Thoughts are things&#8221; is the sleepiest of bromides. Every spiritist and occultist is born with that spoon in his mouth whether he knows it or not. But just what, if you please, do you mean by a &#8220;thing&#8221;? In common use a thing is an object, and an object is objective, visible, and usually tangible. But since thoughts and feelings are not of this sort, how can they be called things? Obviously and QED, such talk is all mystical moonshine.</p><p>But now, suppose I visualize a milk bottle on one end of a table, a large cube on the other, and a solid brick wall across one end of the room. Then suppose some one experienced in the use of this gadget comes in and locates these mental images by feeling around with it, somewhat as a dowser does with a forked stick or a pendulum. Has the thought-form, the mental image taken on &#8220;thingness&#8221;, or has it not?</p><p>Elaborate and repeated experiments show that this feat can actually be performed. Make a mind image, place it definitely in space, and the Aurameter can find it. Touch one book in a row of 50, and the instrument will pick out the right one. We suggest, there is &#8220;something there&#8221;, just as real and objective as any visible brick or box or bottle could possibly be. We suggest, the burden of explanation is now on the skeptic. Let him explain what is happening, and he had better make it good.</p><p>But to go on from there &#8211; since we have no space here to battle with straw men.</p><p>I put an imaginary milk bottle on the table in front of me, and the aurameter man can find it. But it&#8217;s just as easy and as quick for me to put it in another room, another house, another block or city distant. I can put it anywhere I want to, provided I can visualize enough of the background, and distance makes no difference at all, per se. If my friend in Calcutta has an Aurameter and can use it, and I steadfastly visualize a black cat or a bronze Buddha in his library, and if he knows where and when to look for the something I am sending, he will be able to find it and describe its outlines.</p><p>Now, this is the projection of an image, and an image or thought is evidently a reality. That is, it has a material existence, although the matter it is made of happens to be invisible, and untouchable by our unaided hands. It is, if you please, what we call an existent in etheric matter. If you poke the positive pole of a magnet into the positive field of another magnet, you feel a strong repulsion, the push-away of like polarities. The magnetic field is an invisible, tangible entity composed of etheric stresses, but no one thinks of denying its existence. The thought form seems to have the same kind of existence, and the resistence it offers to the aurameter bob feels to the hand exactly the same as that exerted by the magnet. But before the invention of the aurameter we had no instrument (except possibly the pendulum) for measuring it.</p><p>Otherwise stated, a thought image is an etheric construct made by the operation of mind-energy on the ethers. If you don’t believe in the ethers, or in the &#8216;energic&#8217; character of thought, go ahead and make your own interpretation &#8211; only, please do not fail to explain just what it is the aurameter finds and how it finds it.</p><p>In other words, try to &#8216;save&#8217; the phenomena &#8211; or, don&#8217;t throw out the baby along with the bath water.</p><p>Our assumption and information and reasonable belief is, that etheric matter exists everywhere, and that there is an infinite series of ethers of increasing density, and that all of them are particulate in structure, and consequently interpenetrate. <sup><a
href="#2">[2]</a></sup> Our so-called dense matter is really (comparatively) a rarefaction, and the enormously dense ethers pass through it like wind through a mesh with huge interstices. That makes good science and good metaphysics, once you stop to think about it, as most people will not do.</p><p>If, as is highly believable, there are etheric beings living in etheric worlds, their bodies and worlds and all that is in them will be far more dense than ours, the component particles will be thousands or millions of times smaller than our atoms and electrons, and consequently the etheric matter will be responsive to the more subtle forms of energy, that is, to thought energy. And if I visualize a pumpkin, I create said pumpkin in etheric matter, but it‘s out of my plane of visual perception. If I were in an etheric body I would be able to see it, and I could send it by my thought energy to any place I chose. And if I want to construct a flying disc, I would first think it into existence and then spot the etheric creation anywhere I wished. It&#8217;s our information and belief, that most of our space visitors get here in just that way. It is not a problem of constructing a craft out of materials known to us as matter and have it capable of flying across space and withstanding the conditions of space fight. The craft is first built out of enormously dense etheric matter, by thinking it in to form; and this etheric form is &#8216;teleported&#8217; or &#8216;spotted&#8217; along with crew into the upper regions of the earth&#8217;s atmosphere &#8211; the &#8216;trip&#8217; of course taking no time at all. Within the Earth’s gravitational field the vibratory rates of the etheric matter are converted into the slower rate of our earth matter, and then the craft becomes visible and tangible to us. If it is true that we now have many visitors even from &#8216;beyond the galaxies&#8217;, hundreds and even thousands of light years distant, it must be plain that they do not get here in any craft made of earth-substances and travelling at any speed we have even conjectured, and that they do not ‘cross space&#8217; at all in our sense of the words.</p><p>All this kind of thinking clicks well enough with both ancient and modern metaphysics, and also with much contemporary speculative science. It was talking about the aurameter that got us into all this &#8211; for the obvious reason that we now have, for the first time, a &#8216;gadget&#8217; which will show the material presence of an ether-form, or thought form. Our vast ignorance of the whole concept of the ethers, is a kind of black hole of Calcutta for the western mind. We&#8217;re gadget-minded and want to see something move, or hear something click, or read numbers on a scale before we think a &#8216;thing&#8217; is &#8216;real&#8217;. If the aurameter should be studied enough so that its evidence gets through the first layer of western ignorance and stupidity, it will be rated as 20th century achievement No. 1.</p><p>It&#8217;s still bad form, of course, to so much as mention radiesthesia in &#8216;orthodox&#8217; and official scientific circles &#8211; and the aurameter comes under that classification, as a radi-sensitive device, and so will be rated even lower than the pendulum, the former ne plus ultra of childishness. But what is the twaddle of today is often the gospel of tomorrow.</p><p>This aurameter also suggests the possibility of mental communication on this plane by etheric images and symbols. It is also revealing many unknown rays, waves, vibrations &#8211; for instance, an energy stream given off from the tips of cones. It&#8217;s going to intrude into the field of psychometry and pendulum analysis generally &#8211; and it also tells us more about the human aura than is found in all the books. It is, in short, one fine notable ray of light into the black hole we just spoke about &#8211; our western ignorance of the etheric worlds and peoples.</p><p>The point is sometimes raised, that if (say) a Venusian Etherian wants to visit Terra (for to see but not to admire) he doesn&#8217;t need to think up a disc or a mile~long space ship to travel in. His body is made of etheric matter, and it responds to his will, and all he has to do is to think himself even into the most secret places of our world &#8211; and there he is. We are informed that this is quite true, leaving aside various if&#8217;s and but&#8217;s. But let us suppose that he wants to make observations and records, use instruments, maybe offset bad radiation effects, needs active cooperation by other Etherian scientists. It seems natural that he, or they, should prefer to create discs or other craft, load them with the required apparatus, transfer the whole by teleportation to some region close to the earth, and then convert to our vibration rate and so come into our field of perception.</p><p>All this is very crude and sketchy, no doubt, and sounds like amateurish scientifiction; yet I think that basically it is reasonable and plausible and fits in with the known data.</p><p>There has been a good deal of twaddle in the newspapers during the last few months, about a &#8216;revival&#8217; of the &#8216;obsolete&#8217; ether theory, particularly by an English scientist. But the ether concept has never been discarded. Einstein, Jeans, Eddington and many others have said so explicitly. Consider the following quotations from Eddington:</p><blockquote><p> Thirty years ago there was much debate over the question of ether drag &#8211; whether the earth moving round the sun drags the ether with it. At that time the solidity of the atom was unquestioned, and it was difficult to believe that matter could push its way through the ether without disturbing it. It was surprising and perplexing to find as the result of experiments that no convection of the ether occurred. But we now realize that the ether can slip through the atc as easily as through the solar system, and our expectation is all the other way . . .</p><p>(That velocity through the ether is meaningless) does not mean that the ether is abolished. we need an ether. The physical world is not to be analyzed into isolated particles of matter or electricity with featureless interspace. We have to attribute as much character to the interspace as to the particles, and quite an army of symbols is required to describe what is going on in the interspace. We postulate ether to bear the characters of the interspace as we postulate matter or electricity to bear the characters of the particles &#8230;</p><p>In the last century it was widely believed that ether was a kind of matter, having properties such as mass, rigidity, motion, like ordinary matter&#8230; This ceased to be the orthodox view years before the advent of the relativity theory. Logically it was abandoned by the 19th century investigators who regarded matter as vortices, knots, squirts etc.,in the ether; for clearly they could not suppose that ether consisted of vortices in the ether. But it may not be safe to assume that the authorities in question were logical.</p><p>Nowadays it is agreed that ether is not a kind of matter.* Be-non-material, its properties are sui generis. We must determine them by experiment; and since we have no ground for any preconception the experimental conclusions can be accepted without surprise. Mass and rigidity such as we meet with in matter will naturally be absent in ether; but the ether will have new and definite characters of its own. In a material ocean we can say that a particular particle of water which was here a few moments ago is now over there; there is no corresponding assertion that can be made about the ether. If you have been thinking of the ether in a way which takes for granted this property of permanent identification of its particles, you must revise your conception &#8230; The ether itself is as much to the fore as it ever was, in our present scheme of the world. But velocity through the ether (is meaningless).</p><p
style="text-align: right;">(Nature of the Physical World, pp. 3, 30, 31, 32)</p></blockquote><p>Since the passages quoted were written subsequent to the advent of the relativity theory (and in view of later utterances by Einstein and others), the assertion that the concept of the ether has been discarded is absurd. There is, however, a matter of semantics involved in the last paragraph quoted from Eddington. He is unwilling to describe the ether as matter, since it does not possess the characters of matter as we know it &#8211; mass, rigidity etc. This is a question of definitions. If the ethers possess enormous density and consist of extremely small particles in extremely rapid motion, then their mass and rigidity will lie outside the range of our instruments &#8211; hence, by definition, we can say they are not &#8220;matter&#8221;. The point is obvious and not worth laboring, except that Eddington takes a needless plunge into mysticism by postulating a necessary but characterless X to equate with the interspaces. Incidentally, it does us no good to merely substitute the term space for ether unless space be itself a substance or stuff and not mere nothingness &#8211; which is a flatus vocis and not a concept at all.</p><p>We began by talking about the aurameter because its performances make us realize that etheric bodies are &#8216;real&#8217; in a material sense, in the same way that a magnetic field is *real* ; and the quotations from Eddington show that the ether is vez; much of a &#8216;reality&#8217; to the physicist, whether he calls it matter or non-matter or space or an X which can neither be kept out of his equations nor evaluated. The importance of the whole matter, for the ‘average man&#8217; at least, is that unless he can somehow integrate the reality of the etheric worlds into his own thinking, he will never understand a host of remarkable phenomena now occurring on our own plane of existence. Precisely because of this lack of understanding, we are in grave danger of a period of public panic and world-wide confusion. This danger is not merely a matter of being scared witless by &#8220;fireballs&#8221; and &#8220;discs&#8221; and nameless flaming monsters of the skies. It is a most ancient and rational occult teaching, that all the life of our world, and all &#8216;material objects, and the whole of Nature as known to us, originated in the etheric worlds &#8211; the true homeland of the human race. Furthermore, it is the personal conviction of many of us that probably the only hope for humanity now lies in friendly contact and cooperation with the etheric peoples, many of whom are, we now believe, excarnate humans operating from etheric rather than astral levels.</p><p>For the last five years we have been saying things similar to this, and other and wiser folk have been saying it all down the course of human history. We do not keep repeating them in any hope of &#8216;enlightening humanity&#8217;, but only by way of making a kind of gesture which may call the attention of a few, who may then proceed as they will, each on his own path of understanding.</p><p>In view of our reference to Natalli (note to page 2) we may be permitted to introduce a quotation from him. Natalli is a 16th century astronomer who has long been communicating through the deep-trance mediumship of <a
href="http://research.borderlands.com/wiki/Mark_Probert">Mark Probert</a>. (This medium, by the way, has almost no knowledge of technical and scientific subjects). The Natalli Control stated, early in March 1952:</p><blockquote><p> “If we look at densities as blending slowly we arrive at a density which will be to all intents homogeneous&#8221; (i.e., by successive division of the constituent particles of matter). &#8220;But this is not really the case. By basing on the quantum theory each state is periodical a period behaviour of the atoms. This period state can only be conceived of by thinking in this manner. The action of the atom in each grade of density is not a stable condition, but rather a kind of blinking, in lawful sequence. In each passing fraction of time this a different form of motion. Action taking place in one density will cause another form of action in another density. It is this action which creates what you call form.</p><p>&#8220;Now, we wonder where the atom is, in the fraction of time when it is not in action. There is a time vacuum existing between the peri-states of motion. We have a cause~and-effect in play and spanning the gulf of the time interval. There is a stream of force passing between the two densities. Due to the fact that we cannot ever get to a state of nothingness (by successive divisions) the field between the time intervals we may call a play going on between the two &#8211; between the proton and the neutron. They exchange energies until there is a kind of absorption of one of them. Both are sending off energy, and the energy of one is picked up by other bodies. You have a complete breakdown of the atomic body, and it pours itself across this time vacuum into another dimension, where in forming an atomic structure it is moving at a different rate of speed. It may lose or gain electronic bodies in the new dimension and will create a web-like structure with other atoms to form a solid.</p><p>&#8220;The time vacuum lies in the exchange of neutron and proton in which one of these has absorbed the energy of the other. In that moment you have a time vacuum . . .</p><p>&#8220;The fractions of time are not really as we perceive them; the notion is so fast that we cannot make any estimate. But there is a pause in this time field that is a complete nothingness. This is basically a heat action and could be thought of according to a dimension of time as a magnetic or electromagnetic field according to the time interval between. We can say that it is magnetic or electrical or electro-magnetic, or that it is pure heat, depending largely on its use in any particular dimension of time. A passing point that is without atomic structure. The atom pours itself out into another dimension of time, across the time field. This is space-time, or a space vacuum between the nucleus and the electron.&#8221; <sup><a
href="#3">[3]</a></sup></p></blockquote><hr
/><h3>Footnotes</h3><ol><li><a
name="1"></a> Invented by BSR Assoc. V.L. Cameron, <a
href="http://catalog.borderlands.com/index.php?act=viewProd&#038;productId=55">[booklet still for sale under the title "The Cameron Aurameter"]</a></li><li><a
name="2"></a> ‘An infinite series of particulate ethers&#8217; sounds like a logical impasse, but less formidable than a homogeneous ether. The difficulty is neatly handled by Natalli in our Transcript 15, pg. 3.</li><li><a
name="3"></a> Though somewhat aside from the chief concern of this article, we add a philosophical suggestion of extreme importance. In the application of the quantum theory to psychology, to mind-as-energy, we have for the first time a satisfactory solution of the difficulty known as solipsism. &#8211; M.L.</li></ol><p>Related articles:<ol><li><a
href='http://journal.borderlands.com/2011/fly-lokas-fly/' rel='bookmark' title='Fly, Lokas, Fly!'>Fly, Lokas, Fly!</a></li><li><a
href='http://journal.borderlands.com/2011/mat-and-demat/' rel='bookmark' title='Mat and Demat: Etheric Aspects of the UFO'>Mat and Demat: Etheric Aspects of the UFO</a></li><li><a
href='http://journal.borderlands.com/2011/the-existence-of-an-ether/' rel='bookmark' title='The Existence of an Ether'>The Existence of an Ether</a></li></ol></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://journal.borderlands.com/2011/lets-be-fantastic/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>The Electrical Mechanism of the Ether</title><link>http://journal.borderlands.com/2011/the-electrical-mechanism-of-the-ether/</link> <comments>http://journal.borderlands.com/2011/the-electrical-mechanism-of-the-ether/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 07:00:29 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Isaac</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Etheric Physics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Featured Articles]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Electromagnetism]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ether]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Hendrik Lorentz]]></category> <category><![CDATA[James Clerk Maxwell]]></category> <category><![CDATA[The Electrical Experimenter]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://journal.borderlands.com/?p=870</guid> <description><![CDATA[A historical perspective from the dawn of the twentieth century on the etheric physics of Maxwell as compared to Lorentz.
Related articles:<ol><li><a
href='http://journal.borderlands.com/2011/the-existence-of-an-ether/' rel='bookmark' title='The Existence of an Ether'>The Existence of an Ether</a></li><li><a
href='http://journal.borderlands.com/2011/the-nature-of-electricity-and-ether/' rel='bookmark' title='The Nature of Electricity and Ether'>The Nature of Electricity and Ether</a></li><li><a
href='http://journal.borderlands.com/2011/lets-be-fantastic/' rel='bookmark' title='Let&#8217;s Be Fantastic'>Let&#8217;s Be Fantastic</a></li></ol>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The following article by A. Press (B.Sc., Chulalongkorn University), first published in the September 1916 issue of &#8220;The Electrical Experimenter&#8221; (and reprinted in the <a
href="http://catalog.borderlands.com/index.php?act=viewProd&#038;productId=547">2001 Annual JBR, &#8220;Ether, Electricity, and Its Manifestations&#8221;</a>), is an examination of the theories of Maxwell and Lorentz in relation to etheric physics as they were understood in the early twentieth century.</em></p><hr
/><p>The electrical theory of Maxwell was based on the assumption that when a body was electrified something in the nature of a displacement passed from the body into the ether, and from the ether to some other material object or objects said to be electrified.</p><p>That the displacement was not material, that is had no weight, went without saying, for with the most delicate chemical balance no difference in weight could be detected. lt, therefore, had to partake of an ether-like displacement because the ether has no weight.</p><p>Maxwell conceived the idea that is was this mysterious displacement, by an unrevealed physical mechanism, that caused electrified bodies to be attracted or repelled according to the well known material Newtonian laws of mechanics.</p><p>Whereas, the electrical displacement is intangible as it were, because it involves the ether only, forces always very visibly manifested at the material bounding surfaces of the ether were conceived to take place by virtue of a special displacement mechanism which Maxwell assumed. This displacement mechanism was considered to be located in the ether itself rather than in the electrified material bodies.</p><p>Forces there must be in the ether, but it is necessary to remember that we can make sure of their existence only by mechanical reactions of the ether upon material bodies. When the forces refer wholly to the ether they are designated as “generalized” forces. Thus, although an electromotive force is regarded as setting up a flux of electric displacement this force cannot be considered a true force in the Newtonian sense, for matter is not involved, except indirectly. The mechanical of Newtonian forces that are observable on electrical bodies always imply matter, Electrical instruments are employed to measure E.M.F.&#8217;s (potentials) and currents, but it is very obvious that what were really measuring are the reactions of the ether upon material bodies and not the forces that act wholly and entirely on the parts of the medium itself.</p><p>The question can arise whether electricity as such can exist apart from matter. Heaviside is decidedly of the opinion that is cannot. We know that like charges repel each other and therefore the functions of the material bounding surfaces of the ether appears to keep the like elemental charges together. Just how this property is maintained is at once one of the mysteries and distinguishable properties of matter.</p><div
style="margin: 2% auto; width: 520px;"><a
name="1"></a><img
src="http://journal.borderlands.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/fig1.png" alt=" Fig. 1" title="A Schematic Representation Showing How the Pure Maxwellian Ether Waves Pass Thru Interstellar Space from the Sun to the Earth with Velocity of Radiant Light or 186,000 Miles per Second." /></div><p>In the newer theory of Lorentz, electrification of displacement is said to be due to electrons. In the first place it is difficult to see how any portion of electricity can manifest itself except by a material reaction which can be accounted for a Newtonian force being set up. Yet single negative electrons have been observed. Again is the electron or atom of electricity were of the imponderable ether substance then there is difficulty accounting for the elemental electrical charge keeping itself intact; for even an electron is supposed to have dimensions. It was from this that Heaviside foretold that the observable electron would be found to have a material nucleus. It would also seem to nullify the earlier electric particle hypothesis of Maxwell.</p><p>Strange to say in attempting to form a physical picture of electrical displacement. Maxwell himself imagined a sort of purely ether particle which bears a very close resemblance to Lorentz&#8217;s electron particle. However, such makeshift devises, for such they are, do not by any means explain how mechanical energy can be converted into electrical energy of how electrical energy, such as the electromagnetic light from the Sun, can be transmitted through space to be thereafter transformed into work in the service of man, or how to interpret matter in the terms of ether.</p><p>Both Lorentz and Maxwell imagined their ultimate electrical particles to be of such a nature that, in what are called dielectrics or insulators, the electrons are capable of moving only a short distance from their normal state of equilibrium; whereas in conductors such as copper, the electrons were considered to be free and capable of being set in motion by appropriate ethereal or as we now express it- electromotive forces. Such forces, as has already been indicated above, are not, to be confounded with the mechanical forces such as pressure or inertia. Yet when a conductor passes through a state of the ether called a magnetic field, the electrons in the conductor are assumes to be impelled in a certain direction. So far as electrons are concerned, it is electromagnetic force that causes the electrons to travel through what are really the large-sized pores of the material; but so far as the copper or material conductor is concerned it is a Newtonian mechanical force or pull that will be found necessary to be applied to set up the electronic displacement.</p><p>In the dielectric or insulating medium of a condenser the electrons are considered tied, as it were, to the material atoms or molecules of the insulating medium. They are not supposed capable of extended migratory movement from the individual atom. Thus for an alternating E.M.F. large current volumes can be set up but cannot however, be maintained uni-directionally to any considerable extent. Of course, in conductors this limitation is not present and the electrons are free to travel in a complete physical circuit.</p><div
style="margin: 2% auto; width: 520px;"><img
src="http://journal.borderlands.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/fig2.png" alt=" Fig. 2" title="The Complex Action Occurring When a Wireless Waves Speeds 'Over' the Earth and 'Thru' it, by Virtue of Pure Ether Waves (Above) and Electronic Propagation Below the Earth's Surface." /></div><p>The question can also be raised as to how an alternating current can be maintained when there is nothing but the ether between the plates of a condenser. Would such a medium constitute a perfect insulator? The answer for an alternating E.M.F. is, “No.” In fact, besides the Lorentz electrons, with, however, a material nucleus added, one must, because of this, fall back on a true Maxwellian, purely ethereal displacement. According to modern electrons theory the true Maxwellian, purely etheric displacement is always present in a dielectric, but superposed upon it in material media is an electronic displacement, with a material nucleus. The original Maxwellian displacement was structurally undefined. In insulators the electrons are tied, but in material conductors the electrons are free. It would be expected that since the electrons have a material core that these elemental charges should be associated with material media, but the true ether displacement currents of Maxwell, in which the material core is absent entirely, offers considerable difficulties to our understanding or rather visualization.</p><p>In the older theory, such as that of Ampere, the current flowing in a conductor was considered to be altogether distinct from the current flowing in the condenser. It was Maxwell who insisted, however, that the condenser current inside the medium itself must set up magnetic effects equivalent absolutely to those set up in a conductor of like current capacity.</p><p>Nowadays the conductor current of Maxwell’s mysterious days is pictured as being due to an electronic stream of particles having a material nucleus, but the old purely ethereal condenser current of Maxwell has still held its ground but superposed upon the current notion is the one in which, for material dielectrics. Electrons are in addition considered to be displaced to a limited extent just as in the old Maxwellian ether displacement current.</p><p>In considering the manner in which light reaches us from the sun, since this is understood to be an electromagnetic wave phenomena, it would appear to be really of the nature of a true Maxwellian (or pure Lorentzian) character. That is to say the light waves in leaving the sun pass out like straight line streamers of a reeled off link chain in all directions. The one set of links in a plane, see <a
href="#1">Fig. 1</a>, represent the displacement currents of electricity, which Maxwell pictured as due to flux of pure ether particles in such a circuit.</p><p>On the other hand the links looping the first set of links in a plane perpendicular to the latter, represent the closed paths of magnetic disturbances which Maxwell considered was due to what he called “idler” ether particles. Now in considering electromagnetic waves set up by an aerial in wireless telegraphy, the original displacement loops are not considered to lie wholly in the ether, as the must do, when electric waves in the nature of light are sent out by the sun.</p><p>In wireless work such displacement loops are partly true Maxwellian (i.e. they consist of a pure ethereal displacement in ether) and partly what one might call Lorentzian, or modified Lorentzian, because a portion of the loop passes through the earth. That part which passes through the earth would be due to electrons according to modern theory, whereas the remaining part in the ether, or air, would only be due to electrons if the air was what is called ionized; otherwise the actual electrical displacement in the ether part of the circuit would have to be considered pure Maxwellian.</p><p>The difference apparently between a Maxwellian ether particle and a Lorentzian electron is that Lorentz’s electron is supposed to account for the electrical conductivity in solids, liquids, and gases or what is called ionization, whereas Maxwell’s ether particle is supposed to account for the normal ethereal conductivity.</p><p>Related articles:<ol><li><a
href='http://journal.borderlands.com/2011/the-existence-of-an-ether/' rel='bookmark' title='The Existence of an Ether'>The Existence of an Ether</a></li><li><a
href='http://journal.borderlands.com/2011/the-nature-of-electricity-and-ether/' rel='bookmark' title='The Nature of Electricity and Ether'>The Nature of Electricity and Ether</a></li><li><a
href='http://journal.borderlands.com/2011/lets-be-fantastic/' rel='bookmark' title='Let&#8217;s Be Fantastic'>Let&#8217;s Be Fantastic</a></li></ol></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://journal.borderlands.com/2011/the-electrical-mechanism-of-the-ether/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>The Nature of Electricity and Ether</title><link>http://journal.borderlands.com/2011/the-nature-of-electricity-and-ether/</link> <comments>http://journal.borderlands.com/2011/the-nature-of-electricity-and-ether/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 23:55:57 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Isaac</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Etheric Physics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Featured Articles]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Borderlands 1993 4/4]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Electricity]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ether]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Relativity]]></category> <category><![CDATA[William F. Hamilton]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://journal.borderlands.com/?p=850</guid> <description><![CDATA[William F. Hamilton offers a summation of thoughts on electricity, space, and how evidence may support an etheric interpretation.
Related articles:<ol><li><a
href='http://journal.borderlands.com/2011/the-electrical-mechanism-of-the-ether/' rel='bookmark' title='The Electrical Mechanism of the Ether'>The Electrical Mechanism of the Ether</a></li><li><a
href='http://journal.borderlands.com/2011/the-existence-of-an-ether/' rel='bookmark' title='The Existence of an Ether'>The Existence of an Ether</a></li><li><a
href='http://journal.borderlands.com/2011/lets-be-fantastic/' rel='bookmark' title='Let&#8217;s Be Fantastic'>Let&#8217;s Be Fantastic</a></li></ol>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The following article, first published in the <a
href="http://catalog.borderlands.com/index.php?act=viewProd&#038;productId=287">JBR (Vol 49, No. 4)</a>, by <strong>William F. Hamilton</strong> studies, summarises, and speculates on the modern theories of electricity and the physics that support them, introducing into evidence a few of the aberrations of experimentation that may offer new support and weight to the physics of ether.</em></p><hr
/><p>It may come <strong>AS A “SHOCK”</strong> to realize that our very life depends on electricity. Not only does your body operate on changing electrical potentials, but the essential structure of the universe is based on fundamental electric charges, fields, and waves. Nature&#8217;s electrical generators are most evident in piezoelectricity, static electricity, and atmospheric electricity. The sheer, raw power of electricity unleashes its fury daily in thousands of lightning bolts. The magnitude of the volts behind these bolts can reach a startling 100 million between the ground and the base of a thunder-cloud.<sup><a
href="#1">[1]</a></sup></p><p>Science has accumulated a lot of facts about electricity in terms of electron generation, electron flow, electrical current, and voltage sources. The classical model of the atom depicts the electron as a suborbital vehicle or carrier of negative charge. The nuclear proton is arbitrarily assigned a positive charge. The opposite polarity charges are said to be equal in field strength. The Neutron lacks charge or is a composite particle (wavicle/vorticle) of balanced charges.</p><p>In physics or electrical engineering the source of all electrical effects is the electric charge. The magnitude of the force between two electric charges in vacuum is given by Coulomb&#8217;s Law: the force is directly proportional to Q, and Q2 which are the two values of charge measured in coulombs and inversely proportional to the area of permittivity of free space (equal to 8.854 x 10<sup>-12</sup> farad/meter) times the square of the distance between center of the charges in meters. The direction of the force is along the line of the two charges. If the two charge are of the same polarity, the force repels the charges from each other. The fundamental mechanism behind this is not explained. It is just a statement of observation.<sup><a
href="#2">[2]</a></sup></p><p>The fundamental charged particle is the electron which has a charge of 1.60210 x 10<sup>-19</sup> and a mass of 9.10908 x 10<sup>-31</sup> kilograms. A charge has a region of influence that is defined as a field. The field permeates the space around a charge or is a special alteration of space itself. In classical physics, the electron has a radius of 10&#8243; cm. The negative charge was considered distributed around this minute sphere. Physicists then calculated that the negative charge on one part of the electron spheroid would repel the negative charge of another spherical section and cause the electron to explode. In quantum field theory, the electron is considered as a point-particle. Of course with a point-particle, the electrical potential reaches infinity at dead center. Another dilemma.</p><p>Other fields that permeate or alter space are gravitational and electromagnetic fields. The source of these fields resides in a mass or object that itself may be a fundamental field or alteration of space. A yet undetermined relationship exists between the electromagnetic and gravitational fields. In the attempt to unify the forces into one theoretical construct is now referred to as a Grand Unified Theory. A more grandiose term is: Theory of Everything. This is, of course, the ultimate in human hubris.</p><p>The nature of electrical charge is a mystery. We make use of it everyday. But the common facts about electricity are not complete and anomalous electrical behavior has been noted by several experimenters. These anomalies could lead us to an even better understanding concerning the nature of electricity. In order to limit this discussion, I will cite a few anomalous electrical effects that produce contra-gravitational force.</p><p>Dr. Francis Nipher, once professor of physics at Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri performed a modification of the Cavendish experiment in 1916-17. Cavendish used a delicate torsion balance to determine the density of the earth. Nipher used a one-inch lead ball suspended with an untwisted silk thread approximately 180 cm long and centered inside a 5-inch-square box or Faraday Shield. A horizontal slit in the box&#8217;s side permitted Dr. Nipher to observe deflections. He placed an insulated 10-inch-diameter lead sphere next to the iron box. A copper wire connected the large sphere to the metal box to keep them at the same potential. The large sphere was mounted on hard rubber plate. When the large sphere was electrified using a high-voltage influence generator, the normal gravitational attraction of the two spheres was reversed and the small suspended sphere was repelled from the larger by about twice the deflection caused by gravity. Reversing polarity did not alter the effect. When substituting low-voltage AC in place of the H-V influence generator, a repulsion effect was still observed, but one of smaller value.<sup><a
href="#3">[3]</a></sup></p><p>Mr. George S. Piggot conducted even more amazing experiments in 1904 using a powerful electrostatic generator. He made use of an apparatus that had a rotating spherical electrode mounted on a stand. He was able to suspend, against gravity, small metal balls by means of a strong electric field. Extending for about 5 cm. around the perimeter of the objects was a mysterious dark band. He also succeeded in suspending nonmetallic objects such as cork and wood. These objects would oscillate up and down around the center of the field. An improved Wimshurst generator supplied the spherical electrode with approximately 500,000 volts of potential.</p><p>Townsend Brown’s experiments with suspended charged capacitors also demonstrated a contra-gravity effect. When the capacitor was charged, it exhibited a forward thrust towards the positive pole. When the capacitor was mounted vertically on a beam balance, the positive pole vectored thrust exhibited a lifting effect counter to gravity. This did not involve the expulsion of charged particles to produce thrust as in an ion rocket. Brown felt he discovered a principle of electro-gravitation.</p><p>If positive and negative charges are equipotential, then what would cause an unbalanced force between charges? If we lived in a sea of predominantly negative charge, then the action of positive attraction and negative repulsion would work mutually to produce a thrust vector in the direction of the positive pole. That would constitute a testable hypothesis.</p><p>John Searl is said to have employed an unique method of defying gravity using a continuous rotation of cylindrical magnets around a magnetic annulus. A very high electrostatic charge is said to develop between the rollers and the ring producing the Searl levity effect. His generator supposedly levitated of its own accord and generated a pink corona, however, this story has never been verified, or the effect reproduced. However, the Searl disk is claimed to have had a very high potential difference between the center section and rim of the disk, an effect actually noted in the de Palma N Machine. Is the Biefield-Brown effect, as discovered by Townsend Brown, incorporated within the operating principles of these rotating devices? Can a powerful electrostatic field produce an artificial gravitational field or modify the ambient gravity field?</p><p>It is said that the Austrian &#8220;Water Wizard&#8221; <a
href="http://research.borderlands.com/wiki/Viktor_Schauberger">Victor Schauberger</a> built a flying saucer during World War II for the Germans. Schauberger&#8217;s device rotated fluids in a hyperbolic vortex that generated high electrical potentlals and a consequent levity effect.</p><p>The claimed results of these experiments should cause us to ponder and reconsider the current theoretical dogma regarding the laws of electricity and the nature of electrical charge. This should lead us into further physical experimentation to discover the truth of the matter.</p><p>The problem of the nature of electrical charge is tied to the problem of space. Einstein considered the concept of field when thinking of problems in electrodynamics. He rejected the idea of the existence of a form of matter called &#8220;aether&#8221; especially because it reinvoked the idea of an absolute frame of reference. On the basis of the general theory of relativity, space as opposed to what fills space, which is dependent on coordinates, has no separate existence. Space, in the general theory, is not space without a field, but a special case of the gravitational field. Thus, Einstein concludes, there is no such thing as an empty space, i.e. a space without field. In his attempts at a Unified Field Theory, Einstein attempted to reconcile the gravitational held and the electromagnetic field. Einstein conceived space as part of a higher dimension which causes space to warp and bend in the presence of mass. However, this invests space with the properties of a solid. A solid can warp, bend, and convey waves.<sup><a
href="#5">[5]</a></sup></p><p>In quantum field theory, the electron was reduced to a zero-radius point-particle. This raised the problem of infinite energy. This problem was handled through the mathematical technique of re-normalization. To circumvent the problems found in quantum field theory, string theory has been introduced. In string theory, particles like the electron are one-dimensional strings, perhaps joined in closed loops, with different modes of vibration. Again, higher dimension spaces are invoked to maintain a mathematical consistency with experiment.</p><p>There are scientists who find these exotic physical theories wanting, and the lack of mechanical models a hindrance to a real understanding of particle physics.</p><p>One thing that hints that our mathematical only models of space, particles, and charge are wrong are certain experiments in particle physics. Dr. Alan D. Krisch performed proton-proton collision experiments using the Zero Gradient Synchrotron at <a
href="http://www.anl.gov/">Argonne National Laboratories</a> and found that when two protons spin in the same sense and collide, they scatter as expected. When the two protons spin in an anti-parallel sense, they do not deflect, regardless of mutual like charges, but <em>appear through each other like ghosts!</em> These protons are behaving like vortex rings in a fluid medium. Antiparallel vortices will not repel, but attract each other. Charge polarity seems to arbitrarily depend on spin sense and mutual interaction.</p><p>New ether theories have been proposed to account for the existing experimental phenomena and produce visualizable models. These theories should also predict new phenomena that, when subjected to experiment, should be in agreement with prediction. These theories postulate that space is permeated with a fluid medium of energy or that space itself is composed of a fluid. Its almost as if the universe itself were a giant liquid drop of undifferentiated fluid that differentiated by virtue of its internal dynamics.</p><p>William M. Honig of the Western Australian Institute of Technology has proposed a Grand Unified Theory based on a physical model for vacuum space consisting of the superposition of oppositely charged continuous fluids. Models for the photon, electron, neutrino, and proton consist of unique variations in the relative densities of the fluids and their flow patterns.</p><p>Eric J. Lerner in his recent book, <strong><a
href="http://amzn.to/jNadQr">The Big Bang Never Happened</a></strong>, points to the Krisch experiments and his own calculations to state that particles formed from vortices in some fluid is certainly worth investigating.</p><p>The Indian nuclear engineer, Parmahamsa Tewari, has developed a complete theory of space vortices based on a substantial space medium possessing non-material properties. The electron, in Tewari&#8217;s model, is a spherical vortex with a void core. The flow of the medium in a circulating motion at velocity c produces the energy we call charge. An electron will have a clock-wise vortex (negative charge) and a positron an anti-clockwise vortex (positive charge).</p><p>In my own theorizing I believe the electron is producing an outwardly-directed pressure gradient on the surrounding space medium due to its vortex rotation. This pressure gradient is identical to the electrostatic field. According to the law of Continuity for a moving stream of fluid, the density times the cross sectional area of the flow times the velocity must always be constant. Therefore, if the static pressure of the space medium is equivalent to gravitation, and the dynamic pressure is equivalent to electric field, then as the dynamic pressure increases, the static pressure decreases, always maintaining a constant. This establishes an inverse relationship between gravitation and electricity. If there is pressure along one axis, then there is tension along the orthogonal axis. These lines of tension could be equivalent to a magnetic field.</p><p>Some of the ideas expressed here are only rudimentary and introductory and are designed to stimulate further thinking with regards to unexplained physical phenomena. Why do Brown&#8217;s capacitors exhibit thrust? How does a high-voltage field cause levitation? Can we tap the dynamic energy flows of space? When we start to consider these questions perhaps we will move closer to a greater understanding of the nature of electricity and the ether of space.</p><hr
/><h3>REFERENCES</h3><ol><li><a
name="1"></a><a
href="http://amzn.to/knML5S">Nature&#8217;s Electricity by Charles K. Adams</a>. Tab Books, 1987.</li><li><a
name="2"></a>Introduction to Electrical Engineering by Hoyt and Hughs, McGraw-Hill, 1968.</li><li><a
name="3"></a><a
href="http://amzn.to/mtJPx3">Homemade Lightning by R.A. Ford</a>. Tab Books, 1991.</li><li><a
name="4"></a><a
href="http://amzn.to/lTpi7y">Secret of the Creative Vacuum by John Davidson</a>. C.W. Daniel, 1989.</li><li><a
name="5"></a><a
href="http://www.bartleby.com/173/">Relativity by Albert Einstein</a>. Crown, 1961.</li><li><a
name="6"></a><a
href="http://amzn.to/iRLCXs">Superstrings, edited by P.C.W. Davies</a> &#038; Brown. Cambrldge University Press 1988.</li><li><a
name="7"></a><em>Speculations in the Science and Technology Journal</em>, Vol. 5, No.4</li></ol><p>Related articles:<ol><li><a
href='http://journal.borderlands.com/2011/the-electrical-mechanism-of-the-ether/' rel='bookmark' title='The Electrical Mechanism of the Ether'>The Electrical Mechanism of the Ether</a></li><li><a
href='http://journal.borderlands.com/2011/the-existence-of-an-ether/' rel='bookmark' title='The Existence of an Ether'>The Existence of an Ether</a></li><li><a
href='http://journal.borderlands.com/2011/lets-be-fantastic/' rel='bookmark' title='Let&#8217;s Be Fantastic'>Let&#8217;s Be Fantastic</a></li></ol></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://journal.borderlands.com/2011/the-nature-of-electricity-and-ether/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>The Existence of an Ether</title><link>http://journal.borderlands.com/2011/the-existence-of-an-ether/</link> <comments>http://journal.borderlands.com/2011/the-existence-of-an-ether/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 21:55:17 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Isaac</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Etheric Physics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Featured Articles]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Round Robin]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Carl F. Krafft]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Dynamic Ether]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ether]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Michelson-Morley Experiment]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Sagnac Experiment]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://journal.borderlands.com/?p=831</guid> <description><![CDATA[Carl F. Krafft's arguments on behalf of the existence of a dynamic ether. Simple curiosity or simply prescient?
Related articles:<ol><li><a
href='http://journal.borderlands.com/2011/the-electrical-mechanism-of-the-ether/' rel='bookmark' title='The Electrical Mechanism of the Ether'>The Electrical Mechanism of the Ether</a></li><li><a
href='http://journal.borderlands.com/2011/the-nature-of-electricity-and-ether/' rel='bookmark' title='The Nature of Electricity and Ether'>The Nature of Electricity and Ether</a></li><li><a
href='http://journal.borderlands.com/2011/an-excursus-into-etheric-technology/' rel='bookmark' title='An Excursus into Etheric Technology'>An Excursus into Etheric Technology</a></li></ol>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The following two-part article, first published in 1955, presents a starting summary of BSRA <a
href="http://research.borderlands.com/wiki/Carl_F._Krafft">Carl F. Krafft</a>&#8216;s arguments on behalf of the existence of a dynamic ether, a theory he expanded on at length in his many <a
href="http://catalog.borderlands.com/index.php?act=viewCat&#038;catId=25">books and papers on etheric physics</a>. Is Krafft&#8217;s work a simple curiosity, not worthy of consideration, or is it simply prescient? We&#8217;ll let you decide.</em></p><hr
/><p><strong><a
href="http://catalog.borderlands.com/index.php?act=viewProd&#038;productId=354">Round Robin (Vol. 11, 3/6; Sept./Oct. 1955)</a></strong></p><p>In a recent issue of the Round Robin there was a report of a <a
href="http://research.borderlands.com/wiki/Mark_Probert">Mark Probert</a> seance which dealt with the existence of an ether. Although the reasoning was not very clear to me, still the conclusions seemed to be correct. The existence of an ether is not a question that can be answered by a simple &#8220;yes&#8221; or &#8220;no&#8221;, and when I stated in my book on <a
href="http://catalog.borderlands.com/index.php?act=viewProd&#038;productId=144">&#8220;The Ether and its Vortices&#8221;</a> that there can hardly be any question as to the existence of an ether, I meant a dynamic or turbulent ether and not the quiescent stationary ether of the 19th century.</p><p>The <a
href="http://research.borderlands.com/wiki/Michelson-Morley_Experiment_(1887)">Michelson-Morley experiment</a> of 1887 did not disprove the existence of any and every ether, but only of a quiescent ether that is stationary relative to the solar system, and which would produce an ether drift of sufficient magnitude to show up in the experiment. The correct explanation for the Michelson-Morley experiment seems to have been given by George Stokes, who considered the ether as being carried along by the earth‘s gravitational field; but Stokes theory was rejected by the physics profession on the ground that it was contradicted by astronomical aberration. It seems, however, that astronomical aberration does not necessarily disprove Stokes&#8217; theory, because even if the ether adjacent to the earth is carried along by the earth&#8217;s gravitational field, there would still be astronomical aberration further out in space.</p><p>Since the gravitational field of the earth is tied up with that of the sun, it would be more correct to speak of the combined gravitation: field of the earth and the sun, and such a combined field would still be stationary relative to the earth, in complete agreement with the M.M. experiment.</p><p>There still remains to be considered, however, the rotation of the earth on its axis. Since the earth&#8217;s axis is approximately perpendicular to the plane of its orbit about the sun, it necessarily follows that since the earth&#8217;s gravitational field remains tied up with that of the sun, the ether around the earth cannot partake of the rotation of the earth on its axis, but should produce an ether drift of about one-third of a mile per second at the equator, and less elsewhere. That such an ether drift actually exists was proved by the <a
href="http://research.borderlands.com/wiki/Michelson-Gale-Pearson_Experiment_(1925)">Michelson-Gale experiment</a> in 1925, further details of which will be found in my book.</p><p>The finite velocity of light proves that the ether must have mass and inertia, but how is that possible with an ether which is not granular or corpuscular? In my book I advanced the proposition that inertia is really a property of motion rather than a property of matter, because motion without inertia would be a contradiction in terms. Inertia merely means continuity of motion, and without continuity there could not be any motion. Continuity must be either toward and from infinity or around in a circle or other closed path, and wherever it is in a closed path it will appear as localized inertia, which is just another name for mass. With mass thus accounted for, it is not difficult to account for matter, because matter is nothing but a highly concentrated form of localized mass. Less concentrated forms of localized mass are electric and magnetic fields, but this does not include the gravitational field, which is something very different.</p><p>Similar considerations are also applicable to the ether. Any ether which actually exists must have mass and inertia, because an ether without mass and inertia is inconceivable. If, however, we are correct in our interpretation of mass and inertia as properties of motion, then it necessarily follows that the only kind of ether which can conceivably exist is a dynamic or turbulent ether. The perfectly quiescient and stagnant ether of the 19th century was therefore a theoretical impossibility.</p><p>The concept of motion forms an adequate basis for everything in nature, provided we are not too inquisitive as to what it is that moves. We do not need to let this difficulty embarrass us, however, because physicists in dealing with wave mechanics have been confronted with the same difficulty, but have not been seriously deterred thereby. It seems to be the general opinion among 20th century physicists that the concept of motion is complete in itself, even in the apparent absence of anything that moves. On the other hand the 19th century physicists would have pronounced such a view untenable.</p><p>It seems that the solution of this problem is to be found in a compromise between the 19th and 20th century viewpoints. Motion with out anything that moves is indeed inconceivable, but if We assume that the world has always existed and never had any beginning, then there never was a time when we would have been confronted with any such difficulty. The world at any instant is adequately accounted for by considering it as the result of the world at the instant immediately preceding. Since continuity is a necessary property of motion, the existence of an ether in motion at the present instant necessarily presupposes the existence of a similar ether in motion at the instant immediately preceding, and wherever there is an ether in motion there must also be mass by virtue of that motion.</p><hr
/><p><strong><a
href="http://catalog.borderlands.com/index.php?act=viewProd&#038;productId=355">Round Robin (Vol. 11, 4/6; Nov./Dec. 1955)</a></strong></p><p>In my previous article on “The Existence of an Ether&#8221;, the subject was treated from an astronomical standpoint, and it will now be considered from the &#8216;standpoint of the <a
href="http://research.borderlands.com/wiki/Sagnac_Experiment_(1915)">Sagnac experiment</a> which is just as important as the Michelson-Morley experiment, although not as well-known as the latter.</p><p>The Sagnac experiment was first performed in 1915 in France in an effort to disprove Einstein&#8217;s theory of relativity, and with minor variations has been repeated several times since then, but always with the same positive results. It consisted of splitting a beam of monochromatic light into two component beams which were sent in opposite directions around the periphery of a turntable by means of mirrors until they met again at the opposite end of the table so as to produce interference fringes which were recorded on a photographic plate. When the table with all the apparatus on it was slowly rotated the interference fringes were shifted by an amount equal to what the shift would be if the light waves traveled in a medium that was stationary relative to the earth. As long as the table remained stationary, the light waves in the two component beams would traverse the same distance, namely half the circumference of the table. As soon as the table was rotated, however, the light waves of one beam would have to traverse a greater distance than those of the other beam because the photographic plate on which the interference fringes were recorded would then be moving toward the light waves of one beam and away from those of the other beam.</p><p>Since the time of travel in each beam must remain the some, any difference in the lengths of the two paths would have to result in a displacement of the interference fringes in the one direction or the other.</p><p>The same positive result was obtained regardless of whether the source of light was carried by the turntable or was on a stationary support adjacent to the turntable, which rules out any attempted explanation based on the movement of the source of light. The only possible explanation for the shifting of the interference fringes when the table is rotated is that the light waves of the two component beams travel in a medium, namely an &#8220;ether&#8221;, which is stationary relative to the earth, or more specifically relative to the earth&#8217;s gravitational field, and which does not partake to any measurable extent of the rotation of the turntable.</p><p>The Sagnac experiment is therefore in complete agreement with George Stokes&#8217; interpretation of the Michelson-Morley experiment because the gravitational field of the turntable is negligible in comparison with the gravitational field of the earth.</p><hr
/><h3>See also:</h3><p><strong><a
href="http://catalog.borderlands.com/index.php?act=viewProd&#038;productId=144">&#8220;The Ether and its Vortices&#8221;</a></strong> by Carl F. Krafft<br
/><em>Outside the stagnant channels of &#8220;mainstream&#8221; science, leading research is now showing the vortex to be a vital key in understanding the subatomic level of nature. This comprehensive book is Krafft’s masterwork covering: The Hydromechanical Ether, Subatomic Vortices, The New Vortex Atoms, Radioactivity and Atomic Fission, the Nuclear Theory Disproved, and more.</em></p><p>Related articles:<ol><li><a
href='http://journal.borderlands.com/2011/the-electrical-mechanism-of-the-ether/' rel='bookmark' title='The Electrical Mechanism of the Ether'>The Electrical Mechanism of the Ether</a></li><li><a
href='http://journal.borderlands.com/2011/the-nature-of-electricity-and-ether/' rel='bookmark' title='The Nature of Electricity and Ether'>The Nature of Electricity and Ether</a></li><li><a
href='http://journal.borderlands.com/2011/an-excursus-into-etheric-technology/' rel='bookmark' title='An Excursus into Etheric Technology'>An Excursus into Etheric Technology</a></li></ol></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://journal.borderlands.com/2011/the-existence-of-an-ether/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Sky Creatures and Etheric Critters: A Quick and Dirty Intro</title><link>http://journal.borderlands.com/2008/sky-creatures-and-etheric-critters-a-quick-and-dirty-intro/</link> <comments>http://journal.borderlands.com/2008/sky-creatures-and-etheric-critters-a-quick-and-dirty-intro/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 07:00:51 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Isaac</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Ufology]]></category> <category><![CDATA[DOR]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ether]]></category> <category><![CDATA[James Borges]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Meade Layne]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Orgone]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Sky Creatures]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Trevor James Constable]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Wilhelm Reich]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://journal.borderlands.com/?p=81</guid> <description><![CDATA[The first Etherians were detected psychically in the 1940’s; a startling "scientific" technique that begs a new look into consciousness, physics and the life force. It has been postulated that the intense neurological activity of the brain may directly interface with the Quantum Vacuum in ways that seem to verify the claims of magicians for hundreds of years, that the intention focused brain has an effect on environment in which it is physically embedded.
Related articles:<ol><li><a
href='http://journal.borderlands.com/2011/mat-and-demat/' rel='bookmark' title='Mat and Demat: Etheric Aspects of the UFO'>Mat and Demat: Etheric Aspects of the UFO</a></li><li><a
href='http://journal.borderlands.com/1988/reichs-contact-with-space/' rel='bookmark' title='Reich&#8217;s Contact with Space'>Reich&#8217;s Contact with Space</a></li><li><a
href='http://journal.borderlands.com/2010/round-robin-does-the-planet-earth-harbor-spacemen/' rel='bookmark' title='Round Robin: Does the Planet Earth Harbor Spacemen?'>Round Robin: Does the Planet Earth Harbor Spacemen?</a></li></ol>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Original article by <strong>James Borges</strong></em></p><p>I watched a video of a Sky Serpent the other night, but it looked more like a giant butter-fly than anything reptilian. It looked like a floppy circle bending in half and flitting around like a fish out of water. <a
href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RsTunVuFqz4">&#8220;Things never seen seem familiar&#8221;</a> is a paraphrase from an old Grateful Dead song, and this describes my experience pretty well as I instantly recognized it.</p><p
align="center"><object
width="425" height="355"><param
name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/kKgCXcjDV58&#038;hl=en&#038;rel=0"></param><param
name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/kKgCXcjDV58&#038;hl=en&#038;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></p><p> I have been familiar with &#8220;Etheric Critters&#8221; ever since a friend first brought my attention to <a
href="http://www.borderlands.com">Borderland Sciences Research Foundation.</a> It was Borderlands who published some of the original photographs taken in the 50&#8242;s and 60&#8242;s for Dr. &#8220;T. J.&#8221; Constable in his book &#8220;<a
href="http://catalog.borderlands.com/index.php?act=viewProd&#038;productId=74">The Cosmic Pulse of Life</a>,&#8221; and the finest available versions of these photographs are in Borderland&#8217;s 1990 revised edition, now out of print (though there are still a limited copies available); Dr. T. J. has himself reprinted with third generation photographs recently with another publisher.</p><p>These Sky Creatures, or &#8220;Etheric Critters&#8221;, live in the sky, in the ether. This &#8220;ether&#8221;, however, is not the same ether that was disproved by Einstein and Morley-Martin &mdash; it is, instead, an attempt to describe a energetic atmospheric phenomena that has been observed on the borderlands of perception, and, indeed, the word ether has been used many times to denote different ideas as pointed out in the 2001 Journal of Borderland Research (&#8220;Ether, Electricity and its Manifestations&#8221;). The idea of ether as used to describe the UFO phenomenon can be roughly described as a physical density level that is most clearly understood as the Quantum Vacuum in the physics underlying the theory of Free Energy.</p><p
align="center"><object
width="425" height="355"><param
name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/wcwG9oHPv0M&#038;hl=en"></param><param
name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/wcwG9oHPv0M&#038;hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></p><p> Ether is Extra-dimensional. Meade Layne described the first Etheric UFOs as the 4D Ether Ship Mystery. Any discussion of the fourth dimension becomes quickly and hopelessly confused when we try to differentiate between various ideas of the fourth dimension (i.e. equating the fourth dimension with Time), and we are only interested in introducing the idea of extra dimensional theories of the UFO. For a detailed explanation, see Meade Layne’s <a
href="http://catalog.borderlands.com/index.php?act=viewProd&#038;productId=82">&#8220;Ether Ship Mystery (and Its Solution)&#8221;</a>.</p><p>Can living creatures exist in this strange energy dimension? As hard as it is to picture anything living in this energy ocean, it was when borderland technology emerged that allowed us to perceive this living force that these creatures started being observed. The first Etherians were detected psychically in the 1940’s; a startling &#8220;scientific&#8221; technique that begs a new look into consciousness, physics and the life force. It has been postulated that the intense neurological activity of the brain may directly interface with the Quantum Vacuum in ways that seem to verify the claims of magicians for hundreds of years, that the intention focused brain has an effect on environment in which it is physically embedded.</p><p>Wilhelm Reich was no ordinary kook. Reich studied directly under Sigmund Freud, the Father of Modern Psychology. Reich discovered a primary life-force similar to Ether that he called Orgone Energy. One of the amazing features of this energy is that it could be manipulated at great distances in the sky creating rain by altering the relationship of the electrical charge between the earth and the atmosphere using a simple arrangement of tubes that are grounded in running water. He discovered this energy first inside the human body when he was studying the expansion and contraction of the biological organism. Optimum mental and psychic health required the regular contraction and expansion of this vital force in the physical body. The Orgone Accumulator was one of several tools he had developed to help facilitate his research. Atmospheric research led to the development and perfection of the &#8220;cloud buster&#8221; which could change the potentials in the atmosphere at extreme distances resulting in the creation and dispertion of clouds and rain. It quickly attracted the attention of our Sky Creatures.</p><p>Not long after his lab assistants and visitors started reporting strange occurrences in the sky and he himself heard something buzz overhead he began noticing a strange pollution that was effecting the local environment. In his most suppressed book, &#8220;<a
href="http://journal.borderlands.com/1988/reichs-contact-with-space/">Contact With Space</a>&#8220;, Dr. Reich describes the destructive effects UFOs have on our energetic enviornment. It was not more than 30 days after Reich aimed an experimental &#8220;cloud buster&#8221; at one of the many UFOs that were beginning to somewhat harass the pristine wilderness laboratories that the Federal government issued an order for his to cease research and publishing&#8230; not long after, he died in prison and his books and tools were literally burned to ashes like some scene out of the darkest Inquisition.</p><p>In the wake of this suppression that was impossible to ignore, T. J. Constable set aside his phychic contacts with Ashtar Command and started building cloud busters out in the desert. His desire was to physically grasp the ether beyond the subjective impressions of the mind, to twist the invisible into scienifically observable forces that can be engineered. T. J. was able to extend the work of Reich by capturing images of the unidentified flying objects, amorphous blobs in man cases, with infrared filters on his camera. T. J. published his interpretation in The Cosmic Pulse of Life.</p><p>(Jose Escamilla using similar techniques as Mr. Constable was able to make similar photographs of atmospheric creatures he called &#8220;Rods&#8221;. His research can be found on the internet.)</p><p>These observations, although they take place consistently for the last 60 years of UFO reporting, have remained as a kook sideline to the more mainstream abduction conspiracy stories. The idea that some sort of sentient creatures live in the atmosphere or lives in the massively fluctuating energy in the atmosphere is exceedingly hard to conceptualize. This mental picture is becoming much easier to visualize with the images from NASA showing floppy blobs sporting around in outer space. &#8220;Critters&#8221; &#8230; some sort of atmospheric fish?</p><p>But why critters in space? There is no life in space&#8230; or is there? It is theorized by alternative scientists that Orgone Energy exists in space. There is a very important photo of the lunar landing where the astronauts are surrounded by a blue glow; this is thought to be an orgone charge luminescent in the vacuum of space.</p><p
align="center"><img
src="http://journal.borderlands.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/orgonespace.jpg" alt="Orgone in Space" title="Orgone in Space" width="340px" height="340px" /></p><p>The presence of humans and equipment in space is going to create the same energetic conditions as an Orgone Accumulator or a ‘cloud buster’; an extreme potential of Orgone Energy is attracting these critters like they were moths to a flame. We have indeed seen many pictures of &#8220;critters&#8221; hanging around the space station and space shuttle. The latest video of these &#8220;Critters&#8221; is similar to observing sea life in its natural habitat. These elusive &#8220;Critters&#8221; seem most like dolphins that swim along side the crafts that journey beyond the shores into the deep borderlands of science and perception.</p><p><div
style="margin: 4% auto; height: 60px; width: 468px; padding: 2pt; border: solid #CCC 1pt;"><script type="text/javascript">google_ad_client = "pub-6649177294760096";
/* 468x60, created 8/31/09 */
google_ad_slot = "7172065927";
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;</script> <script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js"></script></div></p><hr
/><p><em>Excerpts from <a
href="http://catalog.borderlands.com/index.php?act=viewProd&#038;productId=74">&#8220;THE COSMIC PULSE OF LIFE&#8221;</a> by Trevor James Constable</em></p><h3>Chapter Seven</h3><h4>THE CASE FOR THE CRITTERS</h4><blockquote><p>&#8230; the mistakes and errors are the price for the great romance of doing something for the first time.<p
style="text-align: right;">- SIR FRANCIS CHICHESTER</p></blockquote><p>The concept that certain UFOs could be living organisms not originate with me. Sir Arthur Conan Doyle&#8217;s story Horror of the Heights gives a startlingly prescient description of the &#8220;air jungle&#8221; and its denizens. Doyle makes other references to borderland residents in The Edge of the Unknown, published by Putnams in 1930. Charles Fort also speculated about critters in his Book of the Damned, available in several editions. The first modern theory encompassing this idea with specific reference to UFOs was probably the original &#8220;etheric interpretation&#8221; of the flying discs, formulated in 1946-47 by the late N. Meade Layne, MA.</p><p>Mr. Layne published his theory in a penetrating 1950 monograph The Ether Ship Mystery and Its Solution. He was founder and first director of the <a
href="http://www.borderlands.com">Borderland Sciences Research Foundation, Inc.</a>, in San Diego, California. A former university lecturer and an outstanding writer, Meade Layne produced one of the classics of ufology in his monograph. His achievement was to produce the only theoretical treatment of UFOs to survive the entire modern period. <a
href="http://catalog.borderlands.com/index.php?act=viewProd&#038;productId=82">This document is still available</a> today with added comments by Riley Crabb, second director of BSRF.</p><p>Mr. Layne&#8217;s &#8220;etheric interpretation&#8221; is also readily extensible to cover new UFO facts, and is required reading for any person with a genuine desire to break out of the bondage of mechanistic thinking. There can be no doubt that Meade Layne was a generation ahead of his time with his mobile thinking. He also emerges as easily the greatest writer of ufology&#8217;s break-in period.</p><p>The methods of obtaining advanced information that were employed by this pioneer, at a time when UFO data were sparse, will be dealt with later in proper context. A sample of his writings will illustrate that his work disqualifies with equal alacrity both the faint-hearted and the weak-minded:</p><blockquote><p>&#8220;The aeroforms are thought-constructs, mind constructs. As such, they are, in effect, the vehicle of the actual entity who creates them. Just as our own terrestrial minds rule and become identified with our bodies, so does the entity of the Etheric world make for himself a body or vehicle out of etheric substance.</p></blockquote><blockquote><p>&#8220;This body may be of any shape or size, any one of a hundred mutants &#8211; such as the indefinite and changing shapes reported by observers of flying saucers throughout the world. The shapes may be a wheel, a globe, a fusiform or cigar shape, a fireball, vapor or gases. It may have any density, any rate of vibration desired. The impenetrable steel of landed discs, is, as it were, a sort of etheric isotope of our terrestrial steel, or we may call it &#8216;etheric steel&#8217;. The shapes and vehicles and the entity operating them form one being, just as a human being is a psychophysical mind-body unity. The body of this Etherian entity is a thoughtform which can go anywhere, and penetrates our earth and sea as easily as our air.&#8221;</p></blockquote><p>Etherian physics in all its significance for true ufology &#8211; the ufology of the Future &#8211; will be enlarged upon as this book proceeds. The important point for now is that I was not the originator of the theory that some UFOs could be living organisms, and that Meade Layne &#8211; and also John Bessor &#8211; preceded me by about ten years. When Meade Layne saw my collection of more than a hundred photographs of these mutants not long before his death, he was exuberant. He termed their capture on film &#8220;the death knell of the old order.&#8221;</p><p>Meade Layne&#8217;s daring hypothesis &#8211; a brilliant synthesis of physics and metaphysics &#8211; was shown to be valid when I literally stumbled across these organisms in the summer of 1957. This experimental accident, and my subsequent photography of dozens of these critters in situ, merely confirmed the extant theories of far brighter minds than mine. This borderland breakthrough was crude, awkward and some at uncomprehending, but it nevertheless threw light immediately into the darker, previously impenetrable corners of history&#8217;s greatest mystery.</p><p>Endless implications ensued. Technical, theoretical,cognitional, philosophical, psychological, methodological and scientific questions arose of staggering magnitude. Unraveling all this will take the best efforts of far better and younger, more functional minds than those that currently dominate world science. The response we found, outside the mall circle of friends and associates who understood our work, was essentially confined to fear and anxiety. We understood some of this only too well.</p><p>When these strange living forms burst into our ken, we found it essential to be light-hearted about our work &#8211; if only to diminish the psychological impact of unknown terrors. The sight of these queer, plasmatic fauna in photographs was sufficient to repel sensitive people otherwise interested in UFOs. Motion pictures of them sometimes caused psychically sensitive persons to bolt from the room during screening. Numerous persons today who have tampered chemically with their perceptions by ingesting LSD have become aware of these strange organisms. Back in 1957-58 however, few people were willing to attempt chemical extensions of perception, and prior knowledge of the critters was confined to learned and accomplished occultists, who knew only too well how real the things were that we had been able to capture on film.</p><p>We conceived of ourselves as children, struggling to stay upright by clinging to the side of a crib. Our falls and spills and mistakes were almost perpetual and often comical. Everything we touched was new, and there were no technical ~ texts to consult. Our ability to see the funny side of our adventures never left us, and was always a counterbalance to what might otherwise have become overwhelmingly serious.</p><p>Kidding in no way diminished our curiosity. We kept on after the critters. No one had ever done anything like this before, and it was a tremendous thrill. The laws of these etherain realms are essentially functional and biological, and they open themselves only to the researcher who, in his experimental work, has not lost his ability to play &#8211; to play like a child. The searching organism is almost always playful. A sense of humor is essential, for experience quickly teaches the field worker that the stupidity and cupidity of contemporary man must surely be the comedy of the gods.</p><h3>Chapter Eighteen</h3><h4>FROM ORGASM TO UFOs</h4><blockquote><p>No unimportant man is hated and persecuted as Reich was.<p
style="text-align: right;">- A.S. NEIL</p></blockquote><p>The following account of Wilhelm Reich&#8217;s involvement with UFOs is drawn from Contact With Space. Supplementary and illuminatory material has been contributed by Robert McCullough, one of Reich&#8217;s research assistants at the time. A student of Steiner&#8217;s work in the interim, McCullough is better able on that account to evaluate what happened at Orgonon and in Tucson during those haunted days. My own interpretations and evaluations have been also added, based upon insights, findings and experiences already described in this book.</p><p>The discovery of the orgone energy is the practical, technical break-in to the UFO problem. Appropriately enough, therefore, we find Dr. Reich&#8217;s theoretical involvement with the technical principles immanent in UFOs commencing right after he discovered the orgone in the atmosphere in 1939-40. During the WWII years he worked out a mass-free energy formula, and also a pendulum formula. Both these formulae, and the mathematics from which they are derived, are published in Contact With Space. These formulae anticipate enormous velocities in kreiselwelle functions, and anticipate mathematically the characteristic wobbling and swinging associated with UFOs since 1947. Developed long before that, the formulae ran parallel in the time of their calculation with the first radar sightings of UFOs made by military and naval units during WWII.</p><p>Dr. Reich was a practical man. Since he could not at the time confirm these formulae with actual observations and experiments, he deposited them in the Orgone Institute archives until such time as they could be empirically confirmed. His discovery of the orgone energy had obsoleted the old physics by filling the universe with a mass-free primordial energy. He recoiled from making the kind of abstruse mathematical gambits &#8211; factually unsupported &#8211; that had emptied out that same universe, divesting it even of ether. These notions had hamstrung physical research, blocked comprehension of the orgone energy and led to systematic biasing of the scientific mind against any conception of a living cosmos.</p><p>Dr. Reich decided to wait for factual developments. In 1947 he started his work on vacua that led to blue lumination of the orgone energy. He detailed this work in the first issue of the Orgone Energy Bulletin, published in 1949. This was contemporaneous with Kenneth Arnold&#8217;s 1947 sighting in Washington state, and the subsequent early work and writing of Major Donald Keyhoe.</p><p>In the late 1940s and early &#8217;50s, Dr. Reich occasionally heard about UFOs through newspaper reports and news broadcasts. He was so immersed in his work in biophysics at this time that he paid these reports scant attention. Considering the scope of his research and inventions, the extent of his responsibilities in teaching and running Orgonon, and his artistic diversions into writing, painting and poetry, his brushing contact with the UFO subject is understandable.</p><p>Visitors saw UFOs around Orgonon in 1951. In August of 1952, standing on his front porch, Dr. Reich heard something whizz by from southwest to northeast in a few seconds. He did not see the object. Although the whole subject of UFOs was still largely ridiculed, Dr. Reich himself did not consider that there was anything particularly strange in the earth receiving visitors from outer space. These reverie conditions were soon banished, for in the post-Oranur period the alien invaders intruded upon Dr. Reich and his work &#8211; forcing themselves into his life with malefic intent.</p><p>This truth is far stranger than fiction. The presence of these malevolent aliens might have gone unnoticed, as it has in most of the world, had they not tackled a scientist of such phenomenal observational powers as Wilhelm Reich. His ability to single-handedly punch right through to the orgone discovery, on observation and experiment, is a matter of record. Those same observational powers rallied to his aid in 1953, when UFO attentions to Orgonon developed into an attack.</p><p>Visions of space ships shooting destructive rays into the ground, Hollywood-style, rise to mind at the use of the word attack. The assault on Reich and his work was on a far more subtle and clever scale. Again it aimed at keeping the presence and the purposes of the attackers concealed while the destructive work was done. In the spring of 1952, Dr. Reich noticed a strange black substance settling on the rocks from which his observatory was built. The black deposits also began to appear on other rock surfaces in the vicinity.</p><p>As Bob McCullough recalls, Reich&#8217;s ability to detect such subtle processes was well-nigh incredible: &#8220;Dr. Reich&#8217;s powers of observation were simply tremendous. I never found his equal among the scores of scientists I have worked with since. He was continually drawing my attention to things that had completely eluded me, even close up. His awareness was also astounding, as was the case with melanor, the black substance that we later connected with UFOs.&#8221;</p><p>Dr. Reich noticed the black substance gathering. He made time-lapse films over a period of several weeks. These films proved beyond doubt that the blackening was an ongoing process. Other similar substances Reich detected he named brownite and orite. McCullough made preliminary analyses of these materials in 1953, his findings being published in 1955 in CORE (Cosmic Orgone Engineering), a publication of the Orgone Institute Press.</p><p>Melanor attacked and destroyed rocks and dried up the atmosphere. The substance created excitation of the biological energy of workers at Orgonon, who were afflicted with cyanosis, nausea, thirst and miscellaneous pains. When McCullough scraped or hammered melanor off the rocks for analysis, pressure would quickly build up in his head and his face would flush and burn. Scraping seemed to excite the melanor, which caused a corresponding strong reaction of the biological energy of any human being nearby.</p><p>To melanor was added the compounding problem of DOR &#8211; Deadly Orgone Radiation. DOR is orgone energy that has become sequestered, and resultantly stagnant and stale. DOR clouds surrounded Orgonon and deadened the light. The landscape in the magnificent splendor of rural Maine turned bleak and somber. Trees and shrubs blackened and withered.</p><p>An enterprise dynamically devoted to life thus became surrounded by and infected with death processes. There can be little doubt today &#8211; and McCullough for one has none &#8211; that a new kind of warfare was being waged against Dr. Reich&#8217;s scientific oasis. Had these processes not been rapidly detected by Dr. Reich&#8217;s phenomenal observational powers, they might well have advanced to the point where this malefic engineering would have extinguished Orgonon, Wilhelm Reich and everything to which his discoveries have led us. There are very few people able to tolerate for long &#8211; biophysically and biopsychiatrically &#8211; the kind of conditions that the malevolent aliens subtly imposed on Orgonon.</p><p>Dr. Reich, McCullough and others at Orgonon became aware as events proceeded that their energy was being drawn out of them. In November of 1953, Dr. Reich read Keyhoe&#8217;s Flying Saucers Are Real, and began to put two and two together. Minus any knowledge of orgone energy, Major Keyhoe had set down facts in his book that could not have failed to connect with Dr. Reich&#8217;s pioneering in the borderland of etherian physics. Reich could relate the noiselessness of most UFOs to the near-noiselessness of his own orgone energy motor. The bluish lights often reported around UFOs and as UFOs were functionally related to the blue lumination of orgone energy in vacor tubes. The spinning rotating discs with their oft-noted swinging motions in the heavens were fully compatible with the spinning wave motion of orgone energy, and the mathematical formulae that Reich had worked out during World War II.</p><p>UFOs hung in the night sky around the laboratory. Occasionally they moved and shifted their positions. Dr. Reich took time exposures to objectify their presence. Such photographs proved that UFOs concealed themselves among the stars, a stratagem that I reported from personal experience in They Live in the Sky. Dr. Reich&#8217;s photographs demonstrated the ability of UFOs to materialize and dematerialize. Objects appeared during time exposures and disappeared before the exposures were terminated.</p><p>Dr. Reich and his facilities were getting a great deal of attention from UFOs. This attention was unwelcome, unwanted, disruptive, damaging and dangerous. On many nights, Reich himself was unable to sleep in the quarters at Orgonon, and drove from place to place in a station wagon, snatching fitful catnaps. McCullough has said of this baleful time: &#8220;It was as though the energy &#8211; or something &#8211; was following him around and you could see him becoming slowly exhausted by the strain.&#8221;</p><p>What was actually going on is not too difficult to deduce, given the reality of invisible entities of vast technical skill in those matters to which Wilhelm Reich had broken through. There could be no more effective way to deal with this gifted, brilliant man than to drive him crazy, cause him to break down and to lose his mind and otherwise formidable reasoning powers. To reduce his laboratory with ray guns would only raise endless questions and investigations. Drive him crazy however and every armored nincompoop of high academic qualification would stand vindicated when saying: &#8220;I told you Reich was nuts.&#8221;</p><p><i>The shutters could be drawn on etherian physics for another century.</i></p><p>Dr. Reich decided to fight back. His weapon was his own Invention, the cloudbuster. Designed and developed to control the weather, the cloudbuster was an obvious tool to use against anything operating in the heavens and employing orgone energy functions. Dr. Reich demonstrated weather control with these devices, reported his findings fully in his journals and bulletins, and also made the information available to the U.S. government.</p><p>Others have carried on this work since Dr. Reich&#8217;s death, including myself. As one who has personally worked for many years with cloudbusters, designing, building and operating them experimentally, I have no doubt whatever that they work. In 1974, because of my concern over the spurious expanding use of these devices by amateur experimenters, I personally produced and financed a 75-page survey of orgone energy weather engineering and circulated it to the relevant Federal agencies. The reader will recognize that such a heavy expenditure is not made unless there is both genuine concern over the matters involved and conviction as to the power of the device. This is mentioned here to emphasize that in dealing with Dr. Reich&#8217;s use of the cloudbuster as a weapon, I can once again write as a participant, having myself used cloudbusters to provoke the appearance of certain types of UFOs.</p><p>The original Reich cloudbuster consisted of an array of parallel, hollow, metal tubes. One end of the array is grounded into water. The tubes, or pipes, are mounted on a turntable or similar pivoting assembly so that the free ends of the pipes may be directed into the atmosphere at any elevation and on any bearing like a battery of Oerlikon guns. Dr. Reich theorized that the hollow metal pipes &#8220;drew&#8221; orgone energy into the water, thereby permitting manipulation of the orgone energy potentials in the atmosphere. Through such manipulations, control of the weather may be exercised.</p><p>The cloudbuster gets its name simply. The device will dissipate, i.e. &#8220;bust&#8221;, any discrete cloud at which it is precisely aimed. Since Dr. Reich felt that he was being drawn upon by the UFOs around Orgonon, and that the whole environment was being sucked to death by such drawing, he decided to draw upon the UFOs with his cloudbuster. There have been writers and commentators with no practical knowledge whatever of these matters who have elected to refer snidely to Dr. Reich&#8217;s use of the cloudbuster in this way. He used it as a spacegun because he had no option. He was within his rights to defend his own life, his laboratory and his work against the entities who deliberately set out to harm him.</p><p>On 12 May 1954, between 9:40 p.m, and 10:45 p.m., Dr. Reich turned the cloudbuster on luminous UFOs hanging in the nearby sky. Two UFOs to the west of Orgonon were made to fade out several times by training the cloudbuster on them. This proved that Dr. Reich&#8217;s invention could technically reach the strange aerial objects whose presence was associated with the overall deterioration of the environment at Orgonon. Perhaps it was possible to impair or even disable the propulsion systems of these weird craft. The scenario was that of a battle.</p><p>This experience of causing UFOs to dim out shocked Dr. Reich deeply. He feared that if he attempted further to mitigate UFO mischief upon his scientific center at Orgonon, he might precipitate an interplanetary war &#8211; something General MacArthur had inferred might lie in the near future. Accordingly, Dr. Reich took no further action against UFOs with the cloudbuster until much later that same year. Nor should it be forgotten, in understanding the terrible burdens borne by Dr. Reich at this time, that he was under simultaneous attack by the unholy alliance of Big Medicine and Big Government. Like the UFOs around Orgonon, they too wished to see Wilhelm Reich and his work extirpated.</p><p>An order dated 19 March 1954 directed Dr. Reich to halt all research activity in orgone energy, including publications and publishing. This action hampered his work at Orgonon because revenues that sustained the center came largely from accumulator rentals. Seldom if ever has scientific work of such vital moment been so mindlessly harassed in the name of the law.</p><p>There can be little doubt, with the perspective of the years since these happenings and an understanding of the New Knowledge, that the whole destructive scenario was conceived and executed by the Boys Downstairs. Psychic control of officials who are spiritually inert is about as difficult for alien technology as making a telephone call is for us. The aim of the whole venture was to bring Reich down and bury his work.</p><p>The measure of Wilhelm Reich&#8217;s striking clarity of mind is his ability to keep plowing ahead despite all this engineered adversity. The advancing desolation of the area around Orgonon was associated with the incursion of these big, yellow and &#8220;stars&#8221; after the Oranur Experiment. Melanor, orite and brownite appeared pursuant to the UFO onslaught. Dryness and discomfort ensued in man, animals and vegetation.</p><p>Dr. Reich began to transfer this picture to a world canvas. He began to see the connection between the withdrawal of life energy from Orgonon &#8211; the world center of thought and work on life energy &#8211; and a similar sapping of life energy from the planet as a whole. He could readily relate, with his functional mode of thought, the world-wide expansion of desert conditions to the local conditions at Orgonon. He began to see the drying up of the planet and the planetary problem of DOR as engineered conditions rather than natural developments.</p><p>Dr. Reich began to suspect that UFOs were undermining earth life, subtly, silently, steadily and secretly. He thus became the first scientist to anticipate from knowledge and experience the unpleasant truth about the Boys Downstairs that has been delineated in this book. All of it was based, in his case, upon observation and experiment and without any study whatever of what Dr. Steiner has said about these same matters.</p><p>The years since Dr. Reich&#8217;s death have served to confirm his well-grounded suspicion of what he called the COREmen (for Cosmic ORgone Engineering).</p><p>reddish pulsating</p><p>Related articles:<ol><li><a
href='http://journal.borderlands.com/2011/mat-and-demat/' rel='bookmark' title='Mat and Demat: Etheric Aspects of the UFO'>Mat and Demat: Etheric Aspects of the UFO</a></li><li><a
href='http://journal.borderlands.com/1988/reichs-contact-with-space/' rel='bookmark' title='Reich&#8217;s Contact with Space'>Reich&#8217;s Contact with Space</a></li><li><a
href='http://journal.borderlands.com/2010/round-robin-does-the-planet-earth-harbor-spacemen/' rel='bookmark' title='Round Robin: Does the Planet Earth Harbor Spacemen?'>Round Robin: Does the Planet Earth Harbor Spacemen?</a></li></ol></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://journal.borderlands.com/2008/sky-creatures-and-etheric-critters-a-quick-and-dirty-intro/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
